In recent years, it has become very important for people to learn their history. And some parents think that is enough to learn their children about local history, but the rest think that it is better to study the world history. But I strongly agree with that it is better to learn world history.
Every country has its own history. The history is a circullation like from grandparents to parents, the parents to their children. In order not to stop this circullation, all schools teach local history. Therefore, children will learn history better and become more patriotic by knowing the history of the country. Children who are patriotic will love their country better and grow up to do many. works to develop their country and teach their descendants not to lose their local history.
On the other hand, there are many reasons why I am more convinced that school children should learn world history than native history. Most importantly, it advances world knowledge. Through exposure to international history, they able to study how fast societies functioned, and how cultures and technologies developed, helping them become experienced and well-informed students. In this way, they will be better prepared to acquire knowledge in all corners of the world, which helps them gain a different understanding of the diversity if the world.
In conclusion, while studying local and world history seems to have its own merits. I believe that in the near future, educators must effectively combine local and history knowledge to fully educate future children.
