It is a common discussion today that educational institutions often give greater importance to science, technology, and mathematics subjects, sometimes ignoring humanities subjects such as drama and literature. I disagree with this strong preference for science. While technical skills are highly valuable, schools must maintain a balanced curriculum to ensure students develop completely and successfully.
The main reason for keeping literature and drama in the core curriculum is that they teach students unique skills that science cannot. Firstly, by reading complex novels and plays, students learn about human nature, history, and different cultures. This process develops empathy and improves their ability to think critically about moral and social issues. Furthermore, drama is an excellent way to boost self-confidence and improve a student’s communication skills, which are essential for success in any career path. Therefore, ignoring these subjects would result in young adults who lack important social and interpersonal abilities.
However, the current focus on science fields is understandable. In the modern world, a country’s economic success relies heavily on innovation and technology. Schools feel pressure to prepare students for well-paid jobs in engineering and computer science, which require a solid foundation in scientific principles. For instance, without strong science teaching, a nation would struggle to develop new solutions to major issues like climate change or public health crises. This reality means that science subjects must be taught to a high standard.
In conclusion, although scientific knowledge is necessary for new technology and economic growth, schools should not reduce the importance of the arts. I believe that true education creates well-rounded individuals who possess both technical skills and cultural awareness. Therefore, both science and the humanities should be given equal time and investment in every school.