Actually, many newspapers, magazines, and even social media are often breach into privacy of celebrities or successful individuals in career, especially by targeting their dietaries, cloths, and emotional relations. I believe that such activities as well as publishing them online are violation of privacy which the lawsuit should be considered in the court.
Although newspapers leverage journalists who oversee the life of celebrities in order to promote the number of readers, however, such famous people may not willing to share the information. For example, imagine a famous actor in Hollywood is fond of his colleague and he decides to keep it secret; if a journalist proclaim this event, that actor will be mired in controversy which could be a damage to his professional career.
On the other hand, routine life stream should not be revealed without consent even in minor occasions such as dietaries. For instance, a CEO of a large company may suffer cancer who has been prohibited from beef, mutton, and pork, so their foods consist much of vegetables of which might be a sign of malady. Should media encroach upon the CEO food consumption routine, the company’s shares may be plummeted in stock marketing.
Alongside the mentioned criteria, famous persons are in vain people who are always trying to suit up luxury cloths; the stack of expensive tools e.g., watch, suit, and shoes can increase their followers significantly. Nevertheless, casual appearance illustration in privacy by magazines is tanking their career which the followers are going to be cold feet. In conclusion, private life must be secret and declarations should be done by consent especially regarding important individuals whose careers might be at stake via violation of privacy.