It is widely believed that implementing a justice system with fixed penalties for all crimes is very efficacious in reducing crime rates within societies. While that situation brings along some advantages such as deterrence and a rapid law and order system, some handicaps cannot be overlooked, for instance, the background of offence.
There are several undeniable benefits of implementing a particular form of punishment for offences. Primarily, the circumstance leads to deterrence and hesitation of committing a crime in terms of people who have a predisposition to a crime. Due to the fact that, if people, who are on the edge of committing an offence, may change their minds by taking into account the punishment they will face after the crime. To illustrate, a person, who is liable to commit theft may get rid of his notion by considering the sentencing. Secondly, possessing a certain penalty system is bound to trigger to emergence of a faster justice system. In other words, judges and prosecutors would culminate the trials within a short time, if they knew the exact proper punishments for crimes.
On the other hand, the mentioned justice conditions might resonate as disadvantages in a multitude of ways. Firstly, giving specific sentences to all types of crimes without delving into the reasons behind the offences can give rise to injustice cases. More specifically, consider a homicide case of two murderers. While the first killed a man for defending himself, the second killed a man for just money. Under that circumstance, punishing them with the same penalty would wound the conscience of society.
In conclusion, a monotype punishment layout inevitably presents certain drawbacks such as overlooking the underlying reasons of crimes, alongside advantages for instance a faster justice system and reduced crime rates in societies.