It is claimed that conventional games outperformance modern games in assisting children to develop their abilities. I partly agree with this opinion based on some major reasons that are explained in this essay.
On the one hand, there are some persuasive rationales that traditional games are optimal choice to assist children. This type of game often requires children to take part in various physical activities, which not only benefits their social interactions but also play an important role in keeping them fit. Furthermore, joining outdoor activities have an ability to ascend children’s connections as playing with their peers not only enhance friend relationships but also create a sense of belonging.
On the other hand, there are advantages associate with modern games that make them are more useful than traditional games. In this day and age, the world is developing at a rapid pace, especially in urban area. As a result, there are various infrastructures are being built that limit the space of the children to participate in conventional games. Therefore, many new games have become as an alternative option to assist children’s development. For example, the Sudoku game not only enhances their mathematical ability, thereby, improving their logical thinking but also fosters their memory.
In conclusion, although there are mixed opinions whether modern games are better than traditional games in developing children’s ability, I believe that the balance is the most importance. The authorities should both invest more in games to maximize children’s potential while implement some effective policies to widen more open space to encourage children to take part in social activities.