Many people hold the view that social media or news coverage should be banned for showing elements of violence because is lead to install fear feelings among communities. However, some individuals think it have some advantages. This issue is complex and while there are valid arguments for banning violent media, I believe that a complete ban is not the best solution. In this essay, I will support my opinion with examples.
There are various reasons why many people encourage and want to cancel violence on newspapers and TV shows. Firstly, this lead to bad effect on mentality of individuals, particularly on children and teenagers. In other words, plenty of data about brutality in everywhere lead to that they are become more aggressive and mad. For instance, children might get conflict with their parents, moreover don’t be shy to get physical harm, which decrease normal communication and respect among children and parents.
Another reason is that the information began normal on people mind. Normal is means that how more people recognize violence content, moreover they are feel it basic. As a result, this lead to reduce person’s empathy and compassion. For example, they can don’t help to elderly population on the contrary even bully them on daily life or parents might hit their child and just think it is acceptable.
On the other hand, ban to show brutality can lead to decline of freedom and cancel of truth data. In the medium term, journalists and media coverage must inform people about real situations, even they aren’t generally good news. In other words, instead of fully banning, government should doing strict rules and warnings.
In conclusion, even banning violence content have a lot of advantages, fully cancel them is illogical. The most essential is find balance among inform residents and give them safety from negative influence.