Mostl historical objects of high worth from different antient civilizations over the world are contained in international museums. However , many claim that some of them should be returned to its native land . There is a total agreement from my side about this dispute.
One important fact to notice is that history is a very difficult and debatable science and because of this international disputs have become ordinary thing . Nevertheless , there are some famous museums as Louvre , Ethnic museum of Moscow and’ London’s Natural History Museum which contain artifacts from other countries. Undoubtedly, there are lots of ways to determine the country to which a historical artifact belongs, but basically people and experts should rely on the nation and origin of that artifact. As for the example in 19 century , there was a true leader of Kazakh revolution named Kenesary. Unfortunately , the last “khan” of Kazakhs was murdered by Kyrgyz vandals and as a result , the his skull was transferred to Ethnic museum of Moscow . The fact is that fragments of that value will always create problems among people from different countries. Thats why, I totally agree with opinion mentioned before.
In conclusion, it can be argued that the repatriation of historical artifacts should be prioritized. The rightful ownership of such items is often contested, and by returning them to their countries of origin, ongoing international disputes can be resolved, and cultural heritage can be preserved and respected.