Nowadays, some people think that a group of people with extremely high salaries are beneficial economically to their countries, whereas It would result better if the government restricts everyone’s income rate because equality in humanity can be made, both of which will be discussed below.
To begin, all of the job’s workers have different tasks and all of them deserve to earn a high salary because each job provides diverse tasks which require a lot of effort. Working includes physical strength or knowledge which is sometimes considered complicated for general people to understand, so this work is meant for specific people. Moreover, it is also a means of appreciating the worker’s hard work which encourages them to maintain a valuable work for the country. Perhaps, If the wages for some work get underrated many people will be more likely to quit the job and the whole industry might collapse .
In contrast, the government should control everyone’s salary because all classes can equally choose their living without the privileges of being rich to create equality of income in the society. In addition, no comparison and racismt about their amount of income will be made because everyone tends to access the same quality of product. For instance, everyone does not have to worry about the brand of handbags they use because everyone in the country has a limitation of income to buy the same handbag.
Personally, restricting everyone’s income is more preferable because it provides equality to the society, also the wealthiest group is too small to help the country. Furthermore, privileges for specific groups should not exist because everyone and every class has the same rights in living. Lastly, the number of rich people is too low to impact the whole country’s economy.