It is argued that environmental damage is an unavoidable consequence of a country’s development. I completely agree with this view, as economic progress often leads to a dramatic increase in traffic and the overexploitation of natural resources—both of which severely harm the environment.
First and foremost, one of the clearest signs of economic development is the rapid growth in the number of vehicles on the road. As more people gain access to cars, motorcycles, and trucks, especially in urban areas, the level of air pollution rises significantly. This is clearly seen in developing countries like Bangladesh, where economic growth has resulted in heavily congested roads and extremely poor air quality. Exhaust fumes from millions of vehicles release harmful gases such as carbon monoxide and nitrogen dioxide into the atmosphere, which contribute to both environmental pollution and public health issues. In this case, the rise in traffic, while reflecting economic success, clearly leads to environmental degradation.
Secondly, the exploitation of natural resources is often a necessary step for development. Many countries rely on extracting coal, oil, minerals, and timber to support industries, generate energy, and build infrastructure. However, this process inevitably damages the environment. Forests are cleared, land is degraded, and ecosystems are destroyed to make way for mining operations, construction, and agriculture. For instance, in order to expand manufacturing and export activities, some nations overuse their natural resources without considering the long-term consequences. This short-term economic gain often comes at the cost of long-term environmental sustainability.
In conclusion, I strongly believe that environmental impact is unavoidable when a country develops. The increase in vehicles leads to serious air pollution, while the exploitation of natural resources causes lasting harm to ecosystems. These issues are difficult to avoid in the process of pursuing economic growth.