The question of putting restrictions on smoking in public places is often discussed yet rarely understood. I’m inclined to agree with the point of limiting the severe effects smoking has on surrounding people.
The first and major reason for the prohibition of public nicotine use is secondhand smoke, which is exposed to others. As individuals around the smoker risk inhaling the cigarette’s fumes, the responsibility for unknowingly consuming nicotine lies neither with smokers nor with humans. Research has found that crucial health problems such as lung cancer or depression may stem from secondhand smoking.
The second, but no less important motive for banning smoking in outdoor areas is the unpredictable health risks. Without a doubt, neither the smoker nor others may not know about any possible reactions to fumes, which sums up to hazardous uncertainty of consuming a cigarette. For instance, the reaction of the people with asthma can go up to a sudden loss of breath.
Nonetheless, smoking is a personal decision that individuals have responsibility for. Due to certain life circumstances such as depression, work issues and others it is wrong to limit a person in what they want to do at will. Despite that, the plight can be tackled by the government introducing special spaces for smoking. This solution keeps the balance between a person’s choice to smoke and the health of others.
In conclusion, I believe nicotine use with cigarettes in open places must be limited by the government implementing special spaces in order to reduce the extreme health risks and secondhand smoke others are exposed to.