Human have always had an inextricable relationship with nature, and the ploliferation of techologies has do the climte a disservice, which is indeed presenting an existential threat to humankind. In order to deal with these problems, many people choose to adapt to the change in the environment, but I believe that we should make effort to preclude climate change.
Admittedly, a number of individuals subscribe to the idea that we need to adjust our lifestyle to fit with these changes. Because it is an easy and cost-saving approach, for example, when the weather is like scorching hot, we can apply air-conditioner to cool down, or when it is freezing outside, a heater is a solution. Meanwhile, dealing with the changes in the environment can take a heavy toll on a country’s financial resources.
Nevertheless, this line of reasons is flawed, as the environment degradation is mostly from human-induced, which means that in a change in the actions of citizens, industies and govermant can act as a precursor to the reduction of global warming. Firstly, city dwellers could help alleviate their carbon footprint by using public transports more often, instead of occasionally. Nature can confer enormous benefits when private vehicles is less being used, since the toxic fume would not be discharged as much. Companies may also join hands by developing more renewable and eco-friendly energy sources. Finally, government has a crucial roll in protecting the clime such as boycott businesses that have a dire repercursion on nature or enforce stricter laws to push both residents and industries towards substainability.
In conclusion, while acknowledging several advantages that adapting with climate change could bring, I think that we should save our planet through the deeds of mankind, because a small action of people, companies and government can truthly make a different.