Specialists think it is better if test is taken from cyclists before let them cycle on public roads. I totally disagree with this view, as long as cyclists are not disadvantageous for society.
Firstly, from an ordinary people perspective, it would be time-consuming for them to prepare for this test and most of them buy bicycle instead of car in order to not pass this kind of exam. Because ordinary people do not have enough money and time to prepare and buy these courses for tests. They are always at work and always on a hurry to get everything done, so if authority put this type of test for them, it will influence them negatively. As a result, people may feel tired, stressed and so on, and the more they will think about their test, the more they will depressed. Take the example of office workers, they have to do so many things, that they do not have willing to prepare for this exam or even they do not want to spend their money on it. Therefore, experts should not suggest this test in order to keep safety on roads.
Another point is by giving test to cyclist, government can discourage people from cycling. It is vital to mention that cycling is one of the most important actions for people to stay healthy. Since many people are suffering from lack of activity, nowadays, restricting cycling if they do not passed the test, may lead to a sedentary lifestyle. As a consequence, people may lost eco-friendly and healthy way of transport. For example, if government put this rule and do not allow people to ride without passing the test, people will use car, as these rules are identical for both cars and for bicycles, so people obviously will prefer to buy a car. As opposed to, the number of people, who are cycling may face a sharp reduction. So, in the country people do not need this kind of tests or rules.
To sum up, although many experts believe it is essential for country to put test, I completely disagree with them, since it is negative development for people.