Some individuals argue that it is possible to maintain country’s economy and clean environment however, other part of community consider that it is impossible. I completely agree with this given statement and i have some arguments which will approve this phenomenon.
On the one hand, people who are opposite to this statement say that each country should focus on one exact success of sphere which they mostly prefer and able to do. Moreover, they regard that there are some gradual factors which interrupt government to maintain both economics and ecology. The main reason which they extend is that countries such as India and Brazil have top economy rate than other countries. However, the ecological conditions there much more awful. Due to this argument some parts of community reach the conclusion that even particular country has powerfull wealthiness, it is impossible for country to manage own ecolological conditions and pay attention on it as their economics. Despite this argument above there are really good examples where society achieved to maintain both spheres on a high level as much as possible.
On the other hand, there are some gradual achievements of countries which were able to preserve these two measures well. For example, Scandinavian countries such as Finland and Sweden and also Switzerland have reached success in both indicators. I assume that the main reason of this success is that government and society divided their duties in community equally. Countries’ on the list above dealed with their population where government will always focus on improvement of country’s economics, while people in community try to create and spread the culture of preserving nature. I think this cooperated working in society will lead to success not only in these two measures but also in other sides too.
In conclusion, even there are individuals who have a dout about possibility of keeping these measures on top equally. However, there are several countries which already have proved that it is doable for other countries too.