People have different views as to whether domestic matters or global issues should be focused on by the government. While dealing with internal issues can be attributed to a blend of practical and economic factors, I contend that mitigating global crises is more essential when it comes to surmountable problems such as climate change and the fluctuation of sea levels.
Proponents of addressing internal issues cite various reasons, especially a combination of practical and economic factors, to support their stance. With the increasing competitive trend among countries—such as being the main figure in production, harvesting, and other areas—many people believe that the government must tackle problems like the lack of gas, water, and transport on a domestic scale as a mandatory action for each country. Given this action toward domestic problems, they believe that their country can gain a competitive edge over others. In a world where the public struggles with problems that can be solved by the government, the government’s action to mitigate these problems makes a big difference.
In my opinion, tackling problems on an international scale is of greater importance than addressing those on domestic matters, especially surmountable problems that have a detrimental impact on the whole world—for instance, climate change and the dramatic rise in sea levels. If all countries cope with dangerous problems together, they may overcome these kinds of obstacles with fewer struggles than those faced by individual governments, thereby reducing negative effects before the situation worsens to the point where some countries are unable to solve these challenges and are seriously harmed.
After all, although action taken by the government toward domestic matters can be attributed to a confluence of practical and economic considerations, I believe that addressing problems on an international scale is more essential, especially when they are surmountable and lead to global difficulties.