Art can be broadly defined, such as painting, poetry, music, and digital art. While some people advocate that art is a universal human expression, many believe that it is a skill requiring innate ability and refined talent. In my opinion, although each point possesses its own advantages, I strongly contend that anyone can create art, but not everyone can become a great artist without talent and professional training.
The belief that anyone can create art is rooted in a more inclusive definition of the term. Art is a form of self-expression, not exclusive to gifted individuals. All humans have emotions and imaginations to express their feelings in creative ways. For instance, children can naturally draw paintings from early ages, reflecting their opinions, characteristics, and perspectives toward particular subjects. This not only shows that anyone has the ability to express creativity as a form of art but also demonstrates that art does not require perfection. Whether it is a painting or a piece of poetry, personal meaning matters more than technical quality, and this is what differentiates art from science and engineering.
On the other hand, it is undeniable that high-quality and impactful art demands talent, discipline, and professional training. Proponents of the view that art requires specific abilities argue that art is not merely about expression but about technical proficiency. For example, music demands rhythm, pitch accuracy, and advanced motor skills, which can only be obtained through natural talent and dedication. This hard work, endurance, and determination result in recognition and longevity, which creates an opportunity for artists to see art as a profession. For instance, the significant starry nights painted by Van Gogh displayed the extraordinary ability of the artist, which not only requires talent but also demands skills and persistence.
In my view, while both perspectives have their own merits, art creation is inclusive, while artistic excellence is exclusive. Effort, practice, and education can notably improve skill, but natural talent sets the ceiling and gives artists a head start. There is no prevention for individuals to stop drawing a painting, or singing a song, but talent is what makes your piece apart from other artists.
In conclusion, both views are valid depending on whether art is seen as a personal activity or a professional and cultural contribution. I strongly believe that although natural aptitude is what differentiate arts, it should not be a barrier to entry. Art’s value lies in its power to express human experience, a capacity that is universal.