There is an ongoing debate whether death penalty should be abolished. While some people support this idea, others, including me, argue that it should be retained for the most serious crimes. This essay will discuss both perspectives and the reasons behind my viewpoint.
On the one hand, the protection of human rights is the main reason why people oppose death penalty. Without moral values, human are merely living creatures on the earth, and forgiveness is what distinguishes us and reflects our humanity. When offenders are given a second chance, they can change their behaviour from bad to good. For instance, prisoners can improve their skills and engage in religious activity, such as reading the Bible. This rehabilitation process can have a positive impact on society once they are released.
On the other hand, apart from the protection of human rights, serious crimes, such as rape and murder, have severe consequence for their victims. Victims of rape and murder often suffer the most devastating effects. Giving light punishments to such criminals is not portionate to the gravity of their actions. To illustrate, women who experience sexual assault may live with trauma that affects mental health for the rest of their lives. Furthermore, governments also have a responsibility to provide safe environment for their people and prevent them from such criminals. With all the given reasons, I am in favor of making death penalty a legal options for the most serious crimes.
In conclusion, although human rights play a crucial role in society, serious crimes should be punished by death penalty in order to give a balance outcome for the victims and protect civilians from such criminals.