It is widly said that the number of children should be decreased to save the limited resources all over the world. Moreover, it is also belived that the growth of technologies can help people overcome the problem. I strongly disagree with the statement to decline the children number.
On the one hand, certainly, limitting to have a baby may be beneficial to protect resource in some cases. Firstly, since it would be easy to access to wealth, wars to scramble them must dissppear, which leads the piece to the world. For example, I learned that the World War II was occered because of the shortage of coals in Europian countries. This means enough quantities of properties is significant for the world’s piece. Secondly, this policy can make cities cleaner than now. A prime example of this is India. Since India is overpopulated, Indian goverment cannot control the dometic affairs. As a result, cities are fulled of garages and are not hygienic.
On the other hand, the benefit of using technology outweigh the drawbacks. Latest technics contribute to ensure the enough amount of natural resources. For example, renewable energy, including biodiesel fuel, allows people to use machine everywhere which is lack of oil or coal. Moreover, the political measures to control population must be clitisized due to the human rights. For example, Chinese government tried to command the number of children that one woman can give a birth. However, this decision was bashed by the world.
In conclusion, despite some drawbacks, I believe solving the issue by technology are mostly beneficial. This is because new method to refine resources can be one of the solution, and society should give the top priority on human right.