It is widely said that there will be shortages of natural resources in the future due to overpopulation. Some people argue that the number of children should be reduced to save the limited wealth. However, it is also believed that the growth of technologies can help the race overcome the problem. I strongly believe that technology will be a far more ethical and effective solution.
On the one hand, certainly, limiting the figure of babies may be beneficial in some cases. Firstly, wars to scramble natural resources must disapper. This is because it would be easy for all people to access to wealth. A prime example of this is World War II, I learned that the war was occured become of the shortage of coals in European countries, whose population sharply rocketed. This means enough amounts of properties are significant for the world’s peace. Secondly, minimizing the total of babies leads to the cleanliness of the country. For instance, two decades ago, the Indian government implemented thepolicy to encourage citizens to have only one child. As a result, most town in India got much more hygienic than the past So, in this way, there will be no war, and the sanitary conditions are improved.
On the other hand, the benefit of using technology outweighs the drawbacks. Latest techniques contribute ensuring the enough amount of natural resources or fuels. Biodiesel fuel can be a appropriate circumple of this. By utilizing the new engineering, leftovers can change to biodiesel fuel, which enable society to solve the international issue of wherewithal. Moreover, from the viewpoint of human rights, controling the population must be criticized. For example, the Chinese government tried to command the number of children that one woman can give birth to. However, this decision was accused of immoral. So, employing technology is the most othic.
In conclusion, despite some draw backs, I believe solving the issue by technology is mostly beneficial. This is because a new method of refine resources can be one of the solutions, and society should give top priority to human rights.