There is a debate between individuals who thinks that vertical city with many tall buildings is a good choice rather than horizontal city with a couple of tall buildings. I completely agree with the first statement and type of people who prefers vertical city with a lot of big constructions.
A numeruos buildings are not just for decoration, they have had built for many purposes such as shopping centre where people by clothes or needs, and for business where local residents look for a job and decrease amount of unemployments. However, some people argue that these buildings are so many that the can not enjoy with nature of their city. Thus, debate divided into two arguments and the second supports those, who prefer horizontal city and only several necessarily buildings. Definitely it has own advantage that people will have chance to avoid pollution and enjoy mountains.
Although, from my perspective in urban areas must have such enormous buildings because it will increase the economy of city by earning a lot of money through these places. Also, in cities more young people rather than older people, so juveniles should put effort to develop cities. For instance, HongKong is developed area and people know as “Asian New York”, which means this country very developed and even equaly to NYC(New York City) with a lot of tall buildings with a modern atmosphere. Furthermore, it creates a place where tourists will come oftenly and also helps to enhance economy.
In conclusion, fewer buildings will have in rural ares or in towns, but in urban areas and metropolitians must have multiple buildings for entertainment. In my view, it helps countries to be as popular as other developed countries to enter the global stage.