Preserving endangered species does require much funding and time. In fact, I fully agree with the statement that saving tiger and blue whales is wasting of money, as this effort and fund can be allocated on medical equipments and city improvements.
Firstly, it appears to be wrong to squander money attempting to save endangered animal species, not considering the general heath of city population. Although, I acknowledge that it is essential to donate money to save endangered animals for the purpose of future generations’ interest, I believe that government instead should focus on health of its citizens. To be precise, governmental bodies may allocate money on the modern medical equipments. This is likely to lead diagnosing correctly illnesses of people and prescribing appropriate medicines. As a result, it will combat the possibility of getting another several illnesses such as cancer, that may appear because of wrong tablet consumption.
Secondly, apart from taking into consideration the general health of population, government can focus on improving its buildings and historical monuments, simultaneously. In other words, money that might have been spent on endangered species, can be directed to reconstructing old buildings. For example, there are an excess of apartments, schools, hospitals and historical constructions that are in need of reconstruction processes, but lack of money. By funding to these, we may not only boost the landscape of the city but also attract tourists. As a consequence, after turing city to a tourist attraction, the economy of city would be improved that may serve a good option to save endangered animals in the long term.
In conclusion, although preserving endangered species may offer some benefits, I think allocating money on special medical tools and on boosting the landscape of city may bring economical advantages to the city along with prolonging life of residents.