Some individuals think that wealthy countries should support developing countries with non-financial aid. I totally agree, because non-financial aid, such as technical assistance and education, contributes to great development.
The main reason is that help that is not financial, such as technical assistance, can help poorer countries to build their infrastructure for the long term. Building objects such as roads, bridges, or power grids not only improves country’s infrastructure, but also can enhance citizens quality of life by providing access to basic services such as water and electricity. In addition, there is another significant aspect of technical assistance, such as technology. Rich countries can provide advanced technologies that poorer countries may not be able to develop. For instance, renewable energy technologies, such as solar panels or wind power, can solve problems of lack of energy, and modern medical equipment can improve health care. Thus, technical assistance can be a useful tool for a long-term development.
Another essential factor in favour of assisting less developed countries with non-financial aid, such as education, is innovation and economic growth. Offering scholarships, exchange programs or training programs can improve skills of individuals. As a result, this can lead to sustainable development and innovation. For instance, agricultural training programs may help farmers to learn new, modern techniques and thus, increase crop yields. Moreover, educated residents can then start a business, and this can lead to new discoveries and opportunities for manufacturing. Such knowledge and the consequences of education can be beneficial and long-lasting.
In conclusion, I absolutely believe that well-developed countries should provide non-financial aid, such as technical support and training, for less industrialized countries.