In contemporary societies, there is a prevalent debate whether students should focus to study science subjects or they themselves choose what subjects they want to study. This two options have their own advantages and disadvantages.
If students are asked to studying science, this can variety of outcomes, it depends on the process how the students study this subject. By learning science this can foster students knowledge wider than before, while students with lower focus on this subject, would receive bad consequences. this bad consequences are like wasting their time, their brain did not receive any knowledge, or destroying their future. For example, almost all my friends choose to study science rather than social, despite they know that their brain does not compatible with this subject, this cause the first disadvantage namely wasting their time.
Notwithstanding, some people also suggest that this students should be free to choose the subjects they prefer. From my opinion, if i were the one who participated in this debate, i would pick this one. By allowing students to select their own subjects, this could open their minds and opinions, and choose what subjects they compatible with. this reduces the chance students wasting their daily time in school, because they already pick what their subjects is that suitable to them.
In conclusion, the decision of this argument is dependent on the individuals who argued, because every community have their own requirements to maximise their students knowledge capacity. Every subjects have their own advantages to secure the students future.
