Many individuals believe that competitiveness ought to be instructed at schools, while others argue that teamwork and cooperation are far more essential. I agree with the idea that working together and cooperating are more important.
Competing with other students at school can bring many advantages. To begin with, if being competitive is taught at schools, it can encourage students to study hard and hone their skills that would need throughout their life. Moreover, if schools carry out that practice, it could be one of the big steps to enhance quality of education, because in competitive environment students strive to outperform their peers and in turn they gain valuable and lasting insights. Ultimately, competitiveness not only has critical role in their current academic development, but also it will give potential benefits in children’ later life. To illustrate the claim, students are more likely to develop independence and goal-setting skills later in life.
I believe that teamwork and cooperation should be primary principle of school curricula. In my opinion, collaborative learning environments with partnerships can enhance students’ social skills such as networking, problem-solving and decision-making and if this progress is coached by schools, its effectiveness would get better. Furthermore, collaboration may help students feel more connected and reduce the risk of social isolation and develop public-speaking . For example, that practice has been adopted successfully in many education systems such as the USA, Finland, Sweden, and so on and its potential upsides have proven.
In conclusion, although competing is significant, the benefits of teamwork outweigh the disadvantages.