From a health-conscious perspective, citizens’ exemption from healthcare expenses is considered as an ambivalent topic of discussion. Some people support that the government has the responsibility to provide free healthcare to all citizens, while others argue that each person should cover its own medical costs. This essay, will delve into both stances and articulate the reasons for my advocacy of the first one viewpoint.
A significant reason bolstering the argument of the government responsibility to provide free healthcare to all citizens is the alleviation of social inequalities. To elaborate, a plethora of people having financial problems or underlying conditions, cannot afford to cover all the expenses for their treatments or remedies. This point above, combined with the public consensus that free healthcare is an inalienable right of all people, is possile to induce social inequalities between poor people and people with economic prosperity. For instance, a rich tapestry of potentially fatal diseases, such as cancer or AIDS, could not be treated without the assistance of government, given that the total monthly expenses can surpass the respective individual incomes.
On the other hand, a notable portion of the multitude support that the individual medical expenses should be a financial burden on patients. Their endorsement is founded on the belief that a substantial percentage of government budget is spent on healthcare purposes. According to a recent study conducted by the University of Patras concerning the country of Greece, whose healthcare system is public, a percentage of 15% of the total annual national budget is spent on the treatment of severe maladies. This clearly indicates that is it integral for the government to be relieved from this obligation, in order to dispose more amount of money to other fields, like education or national defense. However, despite the correctness of this argument, the sublimity of people lifes tilts the balance in favor of the establishment of free healthcare systems for all people.
In summary, both sides manifest convincing evidence to elucidate their opinion. However, I am inclined to support that in front of the significance of people lifes, the obligation of government to provide a free and fair healthcare system has a negligible impact on the overall financial planning.