It is argued that elevating availability of foreign-made products in domestic markets has tons of advantages for the national economies as well as culture. Conversely, others contend that it can adversely affect the heritage and local enterprises. This essay will examine both sides of the argument and provide a personal conclusion.
First and foremost, the accessibility of imported goods in local markets has brought positive outcomes for the public. Speaking from my personal experience, I found that my experience illustrates this point well: as an expatriate who lived in London’s countryside, Indonesian products were previously confined to the capital, where they were inconveniently located and exorbitantly priced. Today, these items are readily available in local markets at more affordable prices, allowing me to satisfy my cravings for home-grown food without straining my finances. In addition to this, it also has an effect on international trade, as a country can export its goods all over the world, which can increase national economies.
Conversely, the foreign products have damaged the local enterprises. It is shown by the fact that the consumers choose the imported items as the variety of the items is more diverse. As a result, the local enterprises have lost their customers. For instance, the young generation has started to choose the Korean products over the local products. Furthermore, the young generation is slowly forgetting their roots.
In conclusion, while there are some negative effects to local products, the benefits of the availability of imported goods outweigh the drawbacks.