It is often argued that students should bear every cost of their education at university. I tend to believe that it is a contentious issue as there are people on both sides of the statement with strong logics. However, I strongly disagree with this statement and in the following paragraphs. I am going to support my opinion with examples.
On the one hand, there are a group of people including me who are totally against the viewpoint. The main reason for this can be if the government paid for all educational costs, more students would be involved in studying. In other words, education rate will improve. For example, if the authorities makes education free in every sector, students from all categories can study. Do not write below this line.
Another reason why I disagree with this statement is that some students do part-time jobs for monare their study costs, If the government paid for all their education costs, they would not need it. For instance, the german governement provides all education cost fore students, so they do not need to do Part-time jobs.
On the other hand, there exist another group of people who are against the viewPrint. Their argument is that if students pay their education colts the government is provided budget another sectors, . which help to society, such as hospital, transporting and so on.
To sum up, as far as my explanation is concerned I would like to end up restating that iam Completely on against the statement. In my opinion Students should pay everly educational costs at University and i believe what i have explained support my Opinion.
