Opinions are divided on whether scientific research should be conducted collectively by scientists worldwide or not due to many potential issues. While I understand why some people support the latter ideas, I am in favor of the former.
On the one hand, those who believe that scientists should not work together to do scientific research may worry about its extravagant expenditures. In fact, carrying out global experiments requires a large amount of governments’ budget for scientific equipment and travelling costs, which are indispensable and costly. This spending can be allocated to other meaningful purposes such as providing food, clothes and proper education for those from underprivileged backgrounds, contributing to a more prosperous and equal society. For example, instead of investing in carrying out expensive scientific research, Swedish authorities distributed their funding for homeless individuals, promoting citizens’ quality of life and overall well-being.
Nevertheless, I still side with those who believe that global scientists should collaborate to carry out research and experiments for several reasons. Thanks to collective efforts of scientists from different countries across the globe, more fascinating and helpful scientific knowledge can be discovered, resulting in the invention of more useful products and technological advancements. Such developments can benefit both scientists and individuals, enhancing international collaborations between various nations as well as fostering social connections. For instance, vaccines against Covid-19 virus were successfully produced by both Chinese and American scientists, preventing the spread of this pandemic and improving public health.
In conclusion, despite acknowledging why some people think that scientific research carried out by global scientists together can be detrimental to a certain extent , I still hold the belief that it can be beneficial for individuals’ lives and social developments.