Some individuals are of the opinion that increasing of standard and quality of life depends on economic growth. Others, however, hold the view that focusing on economic development leads to ignore its destructive effects on enviroment. I will discuss both opinions in this essay.
Firstly, a robust economy is crucial to have a high standard of life in all countries. Not having had adequate income, many undeveloped countries cannot build infrastructure effectively. Sometimes, this cause outberaking of waterborne disease such as cholera and amoebic dysentery. To cure patients, goverments also can provide health servises. Additionally, there is negative correlation between famine and economic growth. To prevent famine, authorities ought to have a great amount of income. So, they are able to support agricultural and livestock farming by giving credit to farmers, and are educate farmers to increase yield.
As for negative sides, aspiring economic growth constantly, authorities can ignore its detrimantal effects in enviroment. A variety of industries supported economy use fossil fuel and release it to atmosphere without filter. Rising up carbon dioxide, nitrit oxides and sulphure oxides in the air causes to acid rain that is harmful for all levels of living. They contribute to global warming that is main problem of our civilization. Furthermore, waste water produced by factories are discharged to fresh water such as lake and river without filtering. Many hazard substances enter to food chain, and contamined freshwaters are used to domesic, agricultural and recretional activities. Accumulation of these chemicals disrupts balance of ecosystem.
To summarize, it is irrefutable that strong economy has great contribution to life standard. However, to obtain these facilities, the goverments should not ignore inaccurate practice and put leverage on them. They should adopt eco-friendly manners to increse their income. Using renewable energy sources also decreses contamination of air, water and soil contamination.