There is an ongoing debate over what makes city life better, with some saying it is the public transport system and others arguing there are more crucial services that should be taken into account. The availability of an optimal transport system is admittedly advantageous to enable people to move smoothly; I believe that governments should provide sufficient medical and educational facilities first.
On the one hand, the presence of high-quality public transport, such as railways and buses, is beneficial for both people and the environment. Firstly, the dense network of public transport across the cities can provide users with smooth movement at affordable prices. For example, most people who hate morning and evening traffic jams tend to show preferences for subways in my country. In addition to this, many governments are making considerable investments into the adaptation to eco-friendly means of vehicles, such as electric buses. This modern phenomenon is expected to bring notable cuts in the rate of air pollution—the most worrying problem in almost all cities—supplying citizens with optimized traffic flow.
The aforementioned services—medical and educational centers—will, possibly, lead to more benefits for city dwellers. To illustrate, the noticeable increase in the number of people in cities leads to higher demands for hospitals, especially when people are suffering from chronic illnesses such as obesity and asthma due to unhealthy consumption and air pollution. Moreover, I think governments and city principals should care about the average literacy and proficiency of their citizens more, as they are the main fuel of both industrial and urban revolutions. Therefore, responsible authorities should prioritize establishing adequate education and treatment centers.
In conclusion, while having an effective public transport system brings about certain benefits for both the public and the environment, I think the other sectors—education and medicine—should be paid more attention.