A number of individuals argue that art subjects should be freely chosen by students whether to study or not. From my perspective, I partly agree with this opinion. and this essay will delve into aspects of this view with logical explanations.
There are plausible rationales for the opinion of changing the art into the optinal subject. Several students, especially those who are unskilled in this field, find challenges in drawing. These students potentially fail the semester exam due to its difficulties, which in turn render their study profile related to their future career decreased. Consequently, in some schools, they are required to retake their exam, which often wastes students’ budget. Moreover, students need to spend a significant amount of time and effort to pass these subjects, which can be distributed to the other subjects involving their knack. For instance, art in most of Oriented schools is regarded as a compulsory subject, which a tiny portion of students passionate in this field.
On the other hand, rendering art subjects optional can act as a deterrent to students. This opinion can be explained that art stimulates the creativity in students, which can applied on the other logical subjects such as math and physic. Thus, it is readily understandable that changing the role of art fields can remove the platform logic of students in some specific subjects, as several subjects link tightly with logical functions. An apparent evidence can be seen in most students that drawing a picture improves their observation skill, which are essential in geometric math.
In conclusion, while art subjects can be considered as a deterred subjects to their future career, they also bring numerous benefits to students, especially in their logical function.