In the contemporary world thanks to the development of modern technology, the question is about whether vehicles are supposed to be prohibitted from metropolition area or not has always been a complex and multifaceted issue. To some extent I agree cars ought to be banned in order to reduce pollution because of some reasons, but I still believe there are other aspects to consider. In this essay we will examine both viewpoints and provide a balanced perspective on this issue.
On the one hand, there are some reasons why I agree with those who think automobile should be stop from city so as to reduce pollution. First of all, Cars bring changes in almost all aspects of human life. To illustrate, automobiles are able to far form near. As a consequence, people don’t tired. Take me an example. If cars were not available, individuals could be walk somewhere. Considering that, cars are useful.
On the other hand, certain cases need to be taken into account. Admittedly, Cars adverse effects on air pollution. To clarify, nowadays people use burn fossil fuels and reduce carbon footprint. As a result, Pollution extensive and far reaching effects on air. Take South Korea an example because there don’t have to drive own car. If people were not detrimental effects on air, Air could not disturb of ecosystems. Therefore we need to decreasing the solar, wind hydroelectric and geothermal power.
In conclusion, I have mixed opinions vehicles ought to be banned to reduce pollution and certain cases could be true for different circumstances. That’s why holding a firm opinion about it is difficult than it seems and balance should be the priority in my view.
