In contemporary society, numerous policymakers advocate that languages which are vanishing and falling into disuse should be invested by government, whereas others disagree and think spending money to unnecessary things like this is utter nonsense. This essay will examine both perspectives, ultimately elucidating the complexity of this issue.
On the one hand, each country, village, district possesses its own distinct dialects and languages. Furthurmore, there are so many countries where several dialects are spoken in a region. Take Uzbekistan as an example, although it consists of twelve districts and one republic, more than 100 languages are spoken. However, due to their no longer neing spoken, they are changing dead languages. The more language there are, the more nations will exist, as a result, this will strengthen the bond between people.
On the other hand, due to the excessive proliferation of languages leads to inconvenience situations where man people struggle to understand one another. In essence, if government spend money for their survival, the number of languages might increase rapidly. As a consequence, they do not understand each other, though people are from same county. For instance, individuals communicate only single language in Seoul and it enhances mutual understanding.
In conclusion, on points discussed above, it can be concluded that even though increasing proliferation of languages arises some problems related to understanding each other, each dialects possesses its own history and no one can eliminate them.