In recent years, there have been languages that are declining around the world. While some argue that the low-use languages could be better directed toward individuals and society, and they support the idea of spending money to save the language, others believe that a financial support will be costly and is unimportant. In my opinion, based on the importance of the language, taking steps such as financial support is indispensable.
On the one hand, critics of assistance money highlight the enormous side effects on the government and society’s funding. The government is working on a billion project and has many essential responsibilities and decisions like boosting language, which could reflect on the important expenses, which can lead to real negative seal impacts on the community. For example, some argue that the money on boosting language may include the entire educational institution, and this definitely needs new teachers and will raise the cost of sales workers, which could also require classes and a place to teach these language for those .From this perspective, imposing money on dying language seems like a financially expensive issue for both the countries .
On the other hand, supporters contend that language development offers long-term benefits that far outweigh the side effects. Firstly, many special languages, such as old Irish, as well as specific accents, are direct results of human history and play an essential role in many people’s identity. Secondly, enhancing linguistics saves the strong past, such as old stories and heritage. If the government takes strong steps, like taking part of the money to revive the needed language, it can make strong cultural memory and enable people to collaborate on care and be aware of their language.
In conclusion, although critics argue that the advancement cost is useless. I believe that it has potential benefits for the hall community . These support steps make it a worthwhile and essential its also provides many advantages for the global cultural and diversity. And the government should address immediate solutions related to it, for humans to avoid losing their language.