While some people maintain that the ability to rival with others should be boosted in children, others reject this notion, believing that youngsters must be educated to collaborate and assist rather than just opposing. In the following essay, both aspects will be examined objectively before submitting my personal view.
On the one hand, it is noteworthy that the drive to compete may serve as a means of motivation to children. That is to say, when youngsters have a thrive to win or be the champion of some competitions, they will endeavor to fulfill their goals. Another feasible explanation is that the ambition to win can stimulate innovation and critical thinking. That is attributed to the fact that whenever they want to rank first, they might distinguish themselves from the conventional methods, thereby fostering effective problem-solving. Therefore, a sense of competition will ameliorate children with critical thinking and foster their motivation.
On the other hand, those who disagree point out that the young must be aware of the partnership in education and there are multifarious reasons to endorse this view. Admittedly, collaboration in study can reinforce their opportunities to share diverse perspectives. That is to say, people in a team will provide individuals with varied standpoints, thereby gaining a deeper understanding through those outlooks. Another justification is cooperation may ameliorate children with teamwork skills for both academic and professional success. For instance, people working together in a group tended to know how to delegate tasks, resolve conflict and support each other which is a vital key in the road of attaining a goal. In that way, the collaboration can fulfill them with multiple viewpoints and enhance interpersonal skills
In conclusion, while both approaches have benefits and drawbacks in our ever-changing world, I would concede that youngsters with the ability to assist others in their academic performance are more likely to reach their success.