According to some individuals, competitive games positively influence children’s development; however, there is an opinion about their potential negative effect. I think both groups have a certain grain of truth, as although team sport contribute to developing collaboration skills, they provoke outbursts of aggression.
On the one hand, a common pursuit for victory makes kids unite and come up with creative ideas to defeat opponents. As a result, it teaches them to take responsibility not only for themselves but for others. Nowadays, the ability and readiness to cooperate are essential for any employee because they represent the driving force of the working process. Luckily, these skills may be mastered at an early age on a pitch where players take decisions, reminding those they will have to come to later at work.
On the other hand, a sense of rivalry overwhelms people with destructive emotions. In terms of science, it is anger that enables us to leave competitors behind, and it may extend to daily life. For instance, they argue only to win but not to elaborate on a solution. Unsurprisingly, many adults worry about the high level of cruelty among teenagers, their fear about the additional harmful impact of competitive games might not be unfounded.
Finally, in my opinion, accusations against group games are difficult to prove because adolescents form behavior patterns not on a field. Such things as an unstable family environment and grown-ups with dubious values affect the psyche of a teenager more deeply. Consequently, people should cope with the real reason for child cruelty but see a culprit in plays.
In conclusion, sports possess good and bad sides, like everything in the world. Possible advantages of competitions, such as willingness to team up, outweigh disadvantages that may be tackled.