One school of thought holds that governments should forbid injurious sports, while others are adamant that individuals should be allowed the freedom to participate in any sports or activity. This essay will analyze both stances before concluding that I lean towards the latter.
Granted, it is understandable why some consider forbidding injurious sports. The key rationale lies in the correlation between dangerous sports and human health. For instance, activities such as bungee – jumping leap from a dangerous height can pose a threat to participants and even risk the lives of players. In another perspective, if governments banned extreme sports, the fatality rates should be curbed, leading to a healthier population.
However, the possibility of implementing such a strategy is highly doubtful. The monumental challenge of banning dangerous sports belongs to each person’s preference. This proves especially impractical for compromising privacy rights, and even causes great protest.
Therefore, I am convinced that individuals should be allowed the freedom to participate in any sport or activity. One fundamental reason is that everyone has the right to make personal decisions, as long as those choices are not illegal or harmful to others. Banning can breed resentment, even cause social discontentment. Before joining dangerous sports, players should undergo rigorous training, adhere to safety protocols no longer dangerous as it happens to stop absurd for the government to intervene.
In conclusion, while there are valid reasons for belief that governments should forbid injurious sport, I would argue that individuals should be allowed the freedom to participate in which sports they like.