The question whether or not institutions may invest money in hiring quality teachers or should improve the infrastructure by buying better tools and equipments for students have been a subject of public debate. In my view, I believe that former statement hold greater importance. Here, In this essay, I will elaborate both views
On one hand, proponents who believe that for students, buying a better products and science experiment tools are necessary. With access to these products, youngster may able to comprehend and improve their practical skills such as projects related to science subjects. additionally, using supercomputers, not only help to enhance the programming knowledge but also learn variety of other subject which are crucial to their Academic studies. To cite an example, according to various researches, subject related with equipments mixed with study topics instill the fastest pace of learning however, these products and tools maybe effective for learner but not that much necessary
On the other hand, investing in the field of acquiring teachers which i believe mandatory for schools, colleges and Universities. This is because, no institution can run without the guidance of teacher which possesses abundance amount of knowledge. since only teachers knows the student capabilities and weaknesses. for instance, according to research around the globe, the profession which benefits the country economy is that of a teacher which hold importance place in the eyes of first world leaders, as a result, many Nations jumps from being miserable state to uplift their living standards
To conclude, lthough some believe that money should be spent on education tools and equipments whereas hiring teachers which changes the future of learner considerably must be at all time top priority. I believe that education institution should team up to find teacher who knows students pros and cons
