Some citizens argue that science subjects should be part of everyone’s education, while others contradict it. The first side reason is that society must know about basic science that can assist their daily activities. The other side thinks that learning science does not significantly help their life. I totally agree that supporting science should be part of everyone’s education. Both views will elaborate more after this.
The assertive group argument is when people who study basic science can solve problems in their daily activities. These people focus on basic science that people must know in elementary and Junior School. For example, when people learn about biology, they can understand how to give treatment for their food stock. And so much of human life needs basic science to solve the problem, not only in people’s daily activity but also in people’s whole life.
On the other hand, the opposing team thinks that studying science does not significantly help their life. This opinion appears because people can learn outside of school only in the subject that they really need for their life, not all of the natural subjects. It takes a lot of time to learn it in school. In real life examples, the chef just needs to know basic science relating to foods and kitchen equipment. The chef does not need to know science about how the Moon and Mars have gravitational force that can attract many space objects.
In conclusion, the pro side thinks basic science can make people’s daily activities more easier than before. The contra side argue that science does not really assist their life. That basic science really helps in all parts of this life, so I support science should be part of everyone’s education because it totally approves.