Some people believe that scientifically unhealthy food and drinks should be banned in supermarkets, due to their negative impacts on health and individuals’ budget. I firmly agree with this opinion since strong regulations help promote a healthy lifestyle among societies.
Constantly consuming highly processed foods and sugar-sweetened beverages can lead to diet-related illnesses such as obesity and metabolic disorders. These products are often high in sugar, salt, and fat, which are the main components of obesity. Nowadays, many individuals who have become increasingly reliant on these foods and drinks, often suffer from overweightness. For instance, according to research conducted by WHO, the obesity rates in America have increased significantly and the main reason was the continued reliance on fizzy drinks and processed foods. Therefore, by creating some regulations or completely banning these products, individuals can improve their health by choosing more nutritional food, including fruits or vegetables.
Furthermore, another advantage of prohibiting the availability of processed foods and fizzy drinks at shops is that it encourages citizens to cook at home rather than relying on convenience foods. It does not only affect their health by allowing them to add limited sugar and fat but also positively affect their daily expenditure. Home-cooked meals are more cost-effective than convenience foods and drinks, that tend to be relatively expensive. Consequently, families can feel that their overall spending has considerably decreased, allowing them to allocate money for other needs. This illustrates how mandatory rule on the prohibition of unhealthy foods can have a broader economic benefit.
In conclusion, I firmly believe that regulating on the access to convenience foods is essential because it does not only help promote a healthier population but also ensure that families can spend their budgets more effectively.
gimme detailed feedback according to ielts writing criteria