It is undeniable that road safety, which should be increased by governments in order to protect citizens’ lives, is one of the most important issues in modern world. However, an ongoing debate continues to surround whether increasing the minimum legal age is the best option. While both perspectives possess merit, I firmly side with the view that the driving schools and deterrent penalties is more critical than their age alone.
What lies at the foundation of the arguments for enhancing road safety is that young people are more prone to mistakes on the road. In other words, adolescents are more likely to ignore traffic regulations due to their developmental stage. An additional justification for this view is that the young people do not enough experience to take on responsibility like driving. To further elaborate, young people cannot take on this kind of responsibility because they lack the life experience that fosters maturity.
On the other hand, I endorse the perspective of those who argue that driving schools a play more important role than the age because the people aged 40-45 can also cause serious accidents. That is to say, if people receive proper driving training, they will ready to drive cars or motorbikes at a young age. In addition, the deterrent penalties are also useful in order to enhance road safety. To provide more context, punitive measures might reduce violations=qayda pozuntusu of traffic rules, which may be ignored by drivers of all ages.
In light of the concepts mentioned, I am convinced that increasing the minimum legal age is not a long-term solution because traffic regulations and driver education are more important than age.