There has been sparked controversy over the potential impact of finance on music, dance, and arts classes for youngsters. While a number of individuals believe that the government must invest in children’s lessons, others think children’s parents or personal businesses are responsible for them. In my opinion, there must be a categorization for skills to provide funds and justify my reasons in the paragraphs below.
Initially, the government is the main source of finance and is richer than businesses or youth households, thus, it can provide more funds that lead to enrolling children in music, dance, and art classes. Consequently, children can benefit from expensive and high-quality equipment. Additionally, this is a win-win deal by investing in juveniles. Those children who take advantage of tools and all needed things, can expand their knowledge and skill and shine at the international level and be a source of pride for the country level.
Conversely, some figures believe private companies and kids’ parents should spend money on youth classes to improve their skills, due to the fact that they think there are more necessary topics that the government should investigate. For instance, building roads and construction, improving the country’s facilities or recreational facilities, and furnishing the infrastructure of the city with high-tech equipment.
To conclude, the various aspects discussed underscore the importance of providing funds and I totally agree that government should finance children’s skills, but in my opinion, some skills like music and art are more important than other skills such as dance. Thus, the public administration must spend money on important skills, and private businesses or youngsters’ families should invest in other skills like dance.