In light of globalization, there are more and more international organizations. Some argue that these collaborations will mainly benefit nature, while others put a heavier emphasis on economic profits. In my opinion, I do believe the expanding of cross-border cooperation, primarily partaking in environmental conservation could be more advantageous.
Admittedly, collaboration in international-scale could promote global trading. Through international cooperation, different countries could gather their exclusive advantages
to assist others in order to maximize the optimal environment for economic growth. This can be seen in the reciprocal relationship between Vietnam and Korea, Vietnam imports petroleum from Korea to raise mining industries while exporting electronic components for Korea electronic industries. As a result, the economies of these nations are likely to be comprehensively developed. Consequently, more global collaboration will eventually be advantageous for world business.
On the other hand, others, myself included, reckon that international organizations partaking in protection would bring more profits. Chief of these is the involvement of various expertises and environmental activists. If these professionals worked together, they could exchange technology and sophisticated problems. By this, the emerging nations with severe ecological issues could harness the potential to alleviate such a situation. Furthermore, by submitting conferences, nations could be more aware of their obligations in mitigating global warming. For instance, the United Nation annually held a meeting to encourage minimizing carbon footprint, which is attributed to be the motivation of environmental campaigns around the globe.
In short, despite the marginal economic benefits, it is tenuous compared with the positive effects on the environment. This is because natural resources and ecosystem improvement partly contribute to economic success and even pose as a sustainable development.