Some people desire authorities to invest more in life experiences on other planets, while others claim that it is money consumption and governments should increase their expenses on ongoing issues on Earth. This essay attempts to shed light on both perspectives before concluding that I am in favor of the latter notion.
On the one hand, discovering life appearance on other planets can be adavntageous to a certain extent. First and foremost, new techonologies for space discoveries can also be used in daily life. Given that high technology is complex and of various uses, such as GPS systems on satellites can be used for maps, inventing them can not only increase the pace of discovering new plants but also apply to daily life. Furthermore, discovering new plants can motivate the young generation to pursue this field. This is because children are probably curious about mysterious places. Therefore, increasing experiences on planets and space can stimulate their curiousity to pursue this field in the future, which can increase the workforce.
On the other hand, there are a host of compelling reasons why I am convinced that tackling ongoing challenges on Earth is more important than discovering new planets. A rationale is that pollution threats need immediate attention from governments. To be more specific, pollution is one of the root reasons why humanity are threatened and governments have to find new planets to live. Consequently, solving this problem can reduce the risk of humanity extinction. Another justification is the education inequality. Since poor countries have inferior schooling systems, a small number of students can go to school, which can harm national development in long term. As a result, addressing this issue can help the world develop more balanced.
In conclusion, although discovering life on other planets can be beneficial to a certain extent, I believe that addressing recent serious problems can be more advantageous for governments.