There has been much controversy over whether the emphasis on Mathematics and Philosophy as core disciplines would bring more advantages or disadvantages. Despite some drawbacks, I would contend that this trend can be seen as a positive one.
Admittedly, giving priority to theoretical subjects can be disadvantageous. One evident downside is the lack of creativity and practicability. Both Mathematics and Philosophy delve into such abstract aspects as complicated formulas, concepts, social theories and ideologies, which are incomprehensible and intimidating to a large number of students, particularly if these subjects are not taught in an innovative and engaging way. This can expose knowledge absorbers to demotivation and anxiety. If a student’s career orientation is not related to science or politics, it is unnecessary for them to endure these compulsory subjects.
However, I would argue that placing emphasis on Mathematics and Philosophy brings about more advantages. Learners are offered numerous crucial skills whether they have a good head for figures or not. To be specific, while logical thinking, numeracy skills, analytical skills and reasoning skills are forstered through Mathematics, Philosophy gives them an overview of how society is operated and administered and at the same time allows developing empathy and understanding towards people from all walks of life. All these features are indispensable to anyone on the verge of entering the labour force, helping them to make informed decisions.
In conclusion, although there are concerns about the applicability, creativity and mental conditions when focusing on academic subjects, it seems to me that the potential benefits, such as valuable skills acquisition and understanding enhancement, are more significant.