Many people claim that tertiary education is harder than school. Des In my opinion, I strongly agree with this viewpoint for several reasons such as higher requirements about autonomy and critical thinking skills.
One significant argument is that self-discipline. A secondary student can enjoy constant supervision from their teachers, who offer them structural study methods, valuable advices, and mistake correction. By contrast, university attenders have to figure out everything by themselves without detailed guidances or someone’s overseeing them. As a result, people find it difficult to follow university curriculum and secure excellent scores, especially those lack of autonomy.
Another compelling reason is that demanding curriculum. This is because school pupils only need understand basic knowledges without understanding the core . For example, a student learns history only need to memorise important events, timeline, while history major undergraduates have to analyse these historic events, find out the reasons behind that and develop an independent perspective. Furthermore, tertiary education has to prepare young workforce ability and matched skill in order to secure better career paths, high employability, and workplace skills. This, in turn, makes attenders perform lengthy essays, complex projects, all of which not only need collaboration skill, but also intensive efforts, extensive reading, in-depth insig
hts. In this sense, academic requirements are completely easier and more simple than university.
In conclusion, I firmly support this view since it demands greater attenders’ autonomy, independence, and interpersonal skill. Although both stages require numerous efforts, and hardworking, universities sarely more specialised and professional than schools