Leadership is often perceived as a skill reserved for CEO, managers, or high-profile individuals. However, modern research suggests that great leaders are defined not by titles or past successes but by their ability to anticipate change, build diverse networks, and take courageous actions. I believe that great leaders are not achievements in the past or great names, but by their own capability to accept the replacement, make wide ranging networks, and take daring moves.
Primarily, a leader is there to help the team or the economy perform better and be more resilient. That is what’s most important. People cannot always be a leader, but if they desire to be one, then they should have more education about the subject, which can be an important life skill in politics, etc. For example, Toress acknowledges that exceptional leaders have traits like foresight and courage, but these alone are not good without preparation.
However, numerous people or generations cannot be taught; it is an innate quality. Not everyone is perfect, and most individuals cannot understand. But if they have the skills and abilities to solve the problem, then it will be more effective. For example, 21st century leaders must have both traits and skills to overcome complexity.
In conclusion, people might need the abilities, and they can make a leap to another section. But we need to understand what a leader is and why most leaders in the 21st century are so powerful in their own stance. And that’s preparation, it’s not just the skills, but it’s the development through knowledge.