Band 5+: The best way to reduce poverty in developing countries is by providing at least six years of free education for each child, so that all children can read, write and use numbers.To what extent do you agree or disagree?

In recent year, the issue that offering six years of free education as the optimal solution to alleviate poverty in developing countries has gained significant attention. In my point of view, despite the fact that basic education can play a paramount pivotal role, I think the effectiveness of this method is limited. It is ideal to weigh up the pros and cons of this strategy.

Without a shadow of a doubt, free education can contribute to reduce some nations’ poverty. There is a justifiable reason to note that supporting six-year tuition fee for children can allow them to know fundamental knowledge and escape from several outdated traditions in their living area. To be specific, early marriage in the mountainous region in Vietnam can be cited as an outstanding example, which triggers to the underdevelopment. Hence, if children were covered education tuition, they would be permit to learn knowledgeable foundation and not be kept at home for housework or child labor by out-fashioned traditions.

While the redeeming feature of giving the free education for six years is widely acknowledged, this strategy still have limit in their effectiveness. It is obvious to note that six-year free tuition fee cannot address entirely the poverty issue. The explanation for this is that six-year education, as well as primary education, does not have enough advanced insights and technology for individuals to thrive their nations’ economy in a fast-paced society. So, subsidizing education should be extend to secondary and higher education. For example, Holland is one of the most developed countries, which cover education tuition or provide scholarships to students. This makes a great contribution to reduce the poverty and develop its country. Thus, it is essential to improve the effectiveness of free education by prolong the free education’s time.

In my conclusion, while providing six-year free education is an essential step towards poverty reduction, its time should be prolonged for more advanced knowledge and experience to prosper the nations.