It is widely acknowledged that environmental issues are now becoming global concerns. While one school of thought holds that an increase in fuel price is the optimal solution to reduce those problems, I am of the opinion that there are particular measures which would be more effective than raising fuel costs.
On the one hand, it is understandable why some people advocate the idea of considering high fuel costs as the foremost method to tackle environmental problems. The key rationale is that heightening fuel prices would lead to a decrease in the amount of fuels consumed for transportation and production. This means that the discharge of CO2 and other toxic air pollutants, the main culprit for global warming, would be curbed. However, such a scenario would not happen since using fuel is termed to be a deep-rooted practice of humans, which could be clearly seen that almost all vehicles currently use fuels as the main source of energy. Furthermore, not only may this solution have meager positive impacts on the global environmental condition but also spell trouble for the world’s economy. Therefore, imposing a higher price of this non-renewable energy should not be deemed as the most practical solution.
On the other hand, I believe that other feasible measures could be taken to remedy our environmental issues. One feasible solution should be to raise public awareness about the far-reaching repercussions of environmental pollution. For example, it is imperative that campaigns that encourage citizens to use public transportation be intensified, which may directly reduce the volume of exhaust fumes released from private cars and motorbikes. Such an initiative should be implemented in tandem with an immense investment in green technologies, such as renewables, which is key to lowering the reliance on carbon-intensive energy sources. Compared to heightening fuel costs, those solutions tend to be more sustainable to address environmental deterioration.
In conclusion, I would contend that an increased cost of this conventional energy could not be considered as the most feasible method to solve environmental problems as the proposed measures seem more workable.