There is an argument on significance on significance of individual owned vehicles on a wide part of globe which has culminated on issues of environmental pollution and further leading to global warming. While a number of individuals belief that administration should fund public transport so as to curb this situation . I am of the opinion that it is better to channel income in environmental friendly mode of transport such as electric cars.
On one side of the debate are those people who argue that public transport roads to be funded. They claim that if public transport is financed and encouraged there will be reduction of personal owned vehicles in cities. This approach would be beneficial because it would aid in reduction of congestion in major cities as well as lowering amount of emitted harmful gases in the atmosphere. Furthermore, there will be better and well repaired roads which could also lower the rates of accidents occurrence .
In my standpoint I still believe that zero pollutant mode transport are paramount as it would act as a permanent solution to this burning issue. The reason behind this is that, public transport reduce certain of hazardous gases in the ozone layer while electric vehicles are environmental friendly and are rated to have zero effects in ecosystem by experts. Moreover, buses will cause inconvenience to certain number of citizens because of daily work schedules on how to get to their offices as buses cannot drop them to office doors as compared to saloon cars.
In conclusion, the public mode of transport partially solves the problem of environmental pollution and global warming, therefore, I advocate for electric gadgets and automobiles to be funded as it will not only solve this problem temporary but also act as a permanent solution in the long run.
