There is an ongoing debate among individuals about whether pollution development is possible with a contribute to global warming. While some argue that these two goals are not compatible, I believe that it can be done through policies such as investing in greener energies and paying subsidies to industries. I will elaborate on my opinion.
On the other hand, some state that governments should spend money for the development of public transportation systems in order to help solve this problem. For example, government pay finance can support public transportation. To some extent, for citizens who can’t afford transportation need government support. For example, without government support, global warming.
Conversely, others believe that although electronic development’s side effects are undeniable, the thriving and maintenance and less pollution is compatible with preserving the development. In addition, the government could allocate resources to decrease the constant exploitation of natural resources and drive subsidies to industries to reduce global warming. Thus, these acts can reduce the negative aspects of public transportation systems in different countries.
In conclusion, although there is a common belief that successful car progress is always accompanied by bad pollution, I believe that drivers can play beneficial roles.